Whichever agent names the biggest number is obviously the one who has done the most homework.
Most sellers reach this conclusion the moment three appraisals arrive forty to sixty thousand dollars apart. On the surface it tracks. A sharper read on the market should produce a bigger, more defensible number, so the agent with the highest figure must be the one who understands the property best.
Why the Appraisal Spread Rarely Gets Challenged
When a seller gathers three appraisals for the same property, the results are rarely a tight cluster around one figure. The spread is frequently wide enough that at least one number cannot be close to right. Sellers seldom stop to consider which. Trust tends to default to the biggest figure offered, largely because it lines up with what the seller wanted to hear in the first place.
An appraisal does double duty. It functions as a valuation, but it is also, whether the agent admits it or not, a pitch for the listing itself. Two agents can inspect the same property, look at the same comparable sales, and still land on figures tens of thousands apart, because one is pricing the house and the other is pricing the chance to win the seller over. It is a distinction worth keeping in mind before the first appraisal appointment For those wanting more context before their own appraisal round details here offers useful local context. Either way, the pattern tends to hold regardless of which agent a seller speaks to first.
Why the Largest Quote Is Often the Least Reliable
An agent quoting a high figure is not necessarily demonstrating superior market knowledge. Often they are demonstrating a willingness to tell the seller what they want to hear in order to win the mandate. This is not always deliberate deception. Some agents genuinely believe their optimistic number, at least until the campaign runs and the market fails to agree with them. Either way, the seller ends up choosing an agent based on a number that was never really about the market at all.
What makes this uncomfortable is that sellers rarely find out until the campaign is well underway, once the property has sat on the market for weeks without the level of interest the original appraisal implied it should get. A closer look at how this plays out shows the pattern clearly Sellers still working through what to look for in an agent useful resource is worth a look before appointing anyone. It rarely changes the fundamentals, but it can save a seller from finding out the hard way.
What a Genuinely Defensible Appraisal Looks Like
The appraisals actually worth listening to are rarely the most confidently delivered ones. They are the ones backed by real comparable sales, recent settlement figures, and a straightforward account of what nearby buyers have genuinely paid in recent months. An agent who can walk a seller through that evidence is doing something entirely different from one who just states a number with certainty. Confidence and accuracy are not the same thing, and sellers who conflate them tend to pick the wrong agent for the wrong reason.
There is a simple test for this. An agent with a genuinely defensible number can usually name the specific sales they are comparing against, within a reasonable timeframe and a comparable location. An agent relying mainly on optimism tends to speak in generalities about the market being strong, without pointing to anything specific that supports the figure they have just quoted.
The property is not the problem here. The appraisal process is.
What Matters More Than the Number Itself
The right question is rarely which agent believes the property is worth the most. It is closer to which agent has a genuine strategy for reaching real market value, and which one is willing to have an honest conversation if the campaign does not move at the quoted figure straight away. How an agent has previously handled a mid-campaign price adjustment tends to say far more than any number offered at a first meeting ever could.
This is also the point where simply asking reveals the most. An agent prepared to discuss what happens if the first few weeks underperform is doing something very different to one who has only ever talked about the best-case outcome.
Questions Sellers Often Ask About This
What explains the gap between appraisals on an identical property?
Appraisals combine genuine market judgement with an incentive to win the listing, and different agents weigh those two things differently. The spread between quotes often reflects that incentive as much as it reflects the property itself. An agent under pressure to secure new business has a reason to lean optimistic that has nothing to do with the comparable sales in the area.
Is it ever safe to just go with the highest number quoted?
Occasionally, but it should be trusted because of the evidence behind it, not because it is the largest number offered. A high figure backed by genuine comparable sales is a different thing entirely to a high figure offered simply to win the business, and the only way to tell them apart is to ask what the number is actually based on.
What questions reveal more than simply asking what the house is worth?
Asking what evidence supports the number, and what the plan of the agent is if the property does not attract offers at that figure early on, tends to reveal far more than the number itself. It also tends to separate agents comfortable defending their figure from agents who were hoping the question would not come up.
Should sellers be wary of an agent who quotes a lower number?
Not really. A lower figure backed by an agent who can clearly walk through the comparable sales is often a far stronger signal than a higher one with nothing behind it. Sellers who choose agents based purely on the size of the quoted figure are optimising for the wrong thing entirely.
An appraisal functions less as a measurement of the house and more as an opening bid for the right to list it, and sellers who see this early tend to make a very different call to those who simply chase the biggest number. Throughout the Gawler District and the northern Adelaide corridor, where appraisal spreads can be just as wide as anywhere else in Adelaide, this distinction carries even more weight, given how quickly a mispriced campaign can stall in a market where comparable listings tend to appear close together.